Then something changed. Not all at once — but gradually, then suddenly.
By the mid-2000s, the architecture of the internet began to shift. Facebook and Twitter arrived (I joined Twitter in June 2008). The platforms scaled. Feeds emerged. Algorithms took over distribution.
The web didn’t just grow — it reorganized itself around attention.
And over time, something subtle — but important — was lost. Not access. Not reach. But atmosphere.
Today, the public internet doesn’t just feel different. It often feels … hostile.
Bots. Slop. Trolls. Algorithms amplifying outrage because outrage travels further than nuance. This isn’t a bug. It’s the system working exactly as designed.
And the incentives are clear: Be louder. Move faster. Publish more. Compete harder.
Spend enough time inside that system and — quietly, almost imperceptibly — it starts to shape how you think. Not just about marketing. About your work.
You stop asking what is worth building? and start asking what will perform?
It doesn’t feel like a compromise. It feels like adaptation. Like iteration, like playing the game, like toeing the line just enough to compete. So you tell yourself it’s temporary — but in your gut you know it’s a lie.
But underneath it, there’s often a quiet friction. A sense that something isn’t quite lining up. That, perhaps, the deck is marked.
You care about craft. You have taste. You’re not trying to “win the internet.” You’re trying to build something that matters for people who care.
And yet the environment seems to reward the opposite. Noise. Urgency. Endless output. And increasingly … the wrong kind of attention.
Because attention, it turns out, isn’t neutral.
Some of it compounds. Some of it corrodes.
Most people accept this as the cost of being visible. They tolerate trolls, bad-fit customers, constant low-grade friction — as if it’s just … part of the deal.
It isn’t. Not quite.
Something else has been happening. Quietly. Almost beneath the surface.
Continue (Page 3 of 10) →